< Previous | Contents | Next >
Student Teaching Final Assessment- Part B Early Childhood / Elementary
Benchmark IV- Student Teacher Impact on Students' Learning
Overview: Benchmark IV is designed as a formal assessment opportunity at the end of the student teaching experience for student teachers to provide evidence and documentation of how their teaching impacted their students' learning.
During student teaching, student teachers are asked to collect evidence of student learning and reflect on assessment practices.
This evidence and documentation must be uploaded onto Canvas under Assignments as Benchmark IV to complete your student teaching for the School of Education. This is Part B of your Student Teaching Final Assessment.
Student teachers can select any evidence they feel documents that students have learned as a result of their teaching. Student teachers are encouraged to select evidence that shows students have learned at higher levels of conceptual thinking and development, rather than factual information.
Step by Step Directions:
Think ahead and plan 5 lessons on a topic that could form a unit of study.
These lessons could be spread out over a couple of weeks or within a week's timeframe.
Work with your MT to decide on a timeframe for your 5 lessons.
41
Plan these 5 lessons using your school’s lesson plan format.
Final Submission should Include:
Format of your choice, either a presentation in a slideshow format (aka PowerPoint, Website, Canva, etc.) or a written paper. Either is fine as long as the following information is included.
Cover page with your name, the school’s name, grade level, a unit title and the 5 lesson dates
Statement of unit’s teaching goals and an outline of the 5 lessons for the unit
Be sure to Access Prior Knowledge: How did you formatively access your students’ prior knowledge about the topic you were going to teach? What did you learn about your students prior to beginning the unit? How did this help guide your instruction?
o For example: KWL chart, Concept-Word Web done as a whole class, etc.
If lessons are done with the whole group, take pictures throughout.
If done individually, show 3 different examples that demonstrate different levels of prior knowledge.
Examples of Assessments: What formative and summative assessments did you use to guide your teaching during this unit? Be sure to give examples of the assessments you used. Try to think of various ways to assess students besides with paper and pencil tasks.
Handouts
Checklists
Anchor charts you created with students
Rubrics
Articles of Student Work: What artifacts do you have of student learning? What assessment data did you collect that represents the spectrum of student learning? Think of ways to demonstrate or show that you are monitoring student progress. This could be shown with data of where the students started and where they finished at the end of the unit. Be sure to include measurements of how they have grown.
42
Include 3 student work samples
o 1 sample showing beginning understanding of what you taught
o 1 sample showing intermediate understanding of what you taught
o 1 sample showing advanced understanding of what you taught
Written Analysis: Submit a written analysis answering the following questions. This analysis should be 2 to 3 pages long.
How did your instruction of the unit impact student learning?
Give examples of students you saw make growth and why?
How did you go about meeting various learners' needs? What accommodations or modifications were needed for ALL students to find success?
How did your level of support change based on what you saw students need?
If you had no parameters to teach this unit, what would you do the same and different?
What did you not anticipate happening within the unit? What suprised you?
Please note: Benchmark IV will take much advance planning, preparation, and collecting/documenting data and artifacts during your entire student teaching experience.
Failure to plan and implement your lesson plans early during the semester may result in your inability to finish Benchmark IV and pass your student teaching.
Plan on reaching out to your coach and mentor teacher during the semester regarding your Benchmark.
Assessment of Benchmark IV : Coaches and/or faculty will assess your Benchmark with a rubric.
RUBRIC COMING SOON!
BENCHMARK IV: STUDENT TEACHING
Secondary Education Program Instructions to Student Teachers
Assessment of Impact on Student Learning Part B
44
Benchmark Four is an assessment tool used to measure student teachers' effect on student learning during their teaching experience. It is a crucial part of the accreditation standards and the teacher certification process. Student teachers are expected to collect evidence as specified and submit it to present at the Benchmark 4 interview with faculty and university coaches at the end of the semester.
A. Using a unit of instruction you have taught, please submit the following evidence in your Benchmark Portfolio.
PLACE DOCUMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
1. Include a cover page with your name, content area, school, grade level, and the unit's course.
2. Add a brief statement of the teaching goals for the unit and an outline of the lessons.
3. Provide an example of an assessment of students' prior learning (knowledge), such as a KWL Chart or Anticipation Guide.
4. Analyze how the data collected from your prior learning assessment has informed the instructional plan outlined in item #1 above. Please restrict your analysis to a maximum of one page.
5. Include examples of formative and summative assessments (e.g., handouts, products, or rubrics) used during the unit.
6. Artifacts of student work from assessments represent the spectrum of student learning (samples of low, on-target, and exemplary work) resulting during your instruction unit.
Analysis of student teaching video. One to two-page document that sets the context for this lesson and summarizes the peer review analysis. Instructions for student teaching video (PLEASE USE MICROPHONE SO THAT YOU AND STUDENTS CAN BE HEARD!)
o Capture ten uninterrupted minutes of instruction during the above unit.
o The segment should include student-teacher interaction, e.g., Socratic Seminars, facilitation of text discussion, or discussion of a problem.
o Save the video in a cloud or site that allows you to capture at least 10 minutes of video. This limits the viewing and often does not work.
B. Preparation for the interview:
1. Prepare to discuss/analyze the data collected from your unit assessments that demonstrate how you impacted student learning.
o What do samples of student work reveal about student learning?
o How does your evidence support an impact on student learning?
o Given the instructional goals, what do you see they learned, failed, or misunderstood?
45
o How do the assessments match goals or desired outcomes?
2. Reflect on what changes might be made for future instruction using your evidence.
What would you change or modify, and why?
3. Discuss how you evaluated your teaching on the attached rubric. Complete the rubric and add it to your file.
C. Submitting benchmark evidence in Google Link
1. Submit your link to the Google link sheet. Make them available to the faculty so they can access the material before your interview.
D. Interview information
The date (s) for the interview will be shared out prior.
A time and date will be assigned to you, with a Zoom link before your scheduled date,
Please remember to submit a copy of your completed rubric for the interview.
E. Benchmark Documents
The following documents should provide a detailed explanation of the expectations for the benchmark process.
Overview of benchmark
Explanation of rubric:
o Learning from Assessment Process: Attention to Data
o Evidence of Student Learning: Attention to Evidence of and for Learning
o Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Attention to Subject Matter Knowledge
Rubric
46
Interview Questioning Protocol
The Benchmark IV interview protocol consists of five questions to assess teacher candidates' understanding of the relationship between teaching and learning. Sub-questions are included to probe deeper if initial responses are insufficient, helping evaluate candidates' knowledge and skills in assessing student learning, adapting teaching methods, and analyzing teaching outcomes.
A. Overarching Questions:
1. How do you know that you have had a positive impact on student learning?
2. How does your understanding of students' personal/cultural/community assets, language development, and their prior academic learning influence your instructional decisions?
3. What evidence do you have to demonstrate how you modified your teaching to reach students with special needs and English Language Learners?
B. Learning from Assessment Processes Questions:
How have you used a process of assessment that includes both formative and summative assessments to guide your teaching and decision-making?
a. How did you present students with standards for quality student work and provide feedback to students on their performance?
b. What types of assessments of student learning did you use with what outcomes and implications?
c. How do your methods of assessment support your teaching methods and goals for student learning?
d. What modifications/adjustments did you make to your lessons to assess students with special needs, particularly special education students and English Language Learners?
C. Analyzing Evidence of Student Learning Questions:
What evidence do you have that you have impacted student learning through your efforts to teach?
a. What evidence can you provide for student learning tied to your learning goals?
b. What did you learn from analyzing your impact on students learning about the teaching-learning process?
c. How does your evidence of student learning inform your decisions about the next What are the steps for improving future teaching and student learning?
D. Demonstrating Culturally Responsive Pedagogical Content Knowledge Questions:
How do your students, subject matter, and pedagogy come together to learn?
a. Based on your student's culture and learning needs, what did you anticipate regarding students' understandings or misunderstandings of the academic concepts you were focused on?
b. How did you differentiate your feedback or assistance to students to support them in comprehending academic content?
c. What evidence can you provide that your feedback or assistance in the instructional unit produced quality evidence of student learning?
47
STUDENT TEACHING PORTFOLIO RUBRIC |
|||||
Indicator |
Level 4 |
Level 3 |
Level 2 |
Level 1 |
Written comments |
The depth of Content Knowledge of Concepts Evident in Learning Experiences (What is the nature/quality of your chosen learning activities?) (InTASC Standard #4) |
The teacher comprehensively understands the field's core concepts, research methods, and structures. (s) they teach and create learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to ensure content mastery. |
The teacher demonstrates a solid understanding of the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) they teach and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible for learners to ensure mastery of content. |
Some learning experiences lack grounding in critical discipline aspects. The teacher partially understands concepts, inquiry tools, and structures of the taught discipline(s).; |
The teacher's lack of understanding of central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) reflected in the inadequate learning experiences provided. |
|
Evidence/Analysis of Learner Progress (What did the students learn from those learning activities, and how did that affect your next steps?) (InTASC Standard #6) |
The teacher understands and uses multiple and varied assessment methods to engage learners in their growth, monitor learner progress, and guide the teacher's and learner's decision-making. |
The teacher understands and uses two different assessment methods to engage learners in their growth, monitor learner progress, and guide the teacher's and learner's decision-making. |
The teacher understands and uses one assessment method to engage learners in their growth, monitor learner progress, or guide the teacher's and learner's decision-making. |
The teacher does not use assessment methods to engage learners in their growth, monitor learner progress, or guide the teacher's and learner's decision-making. |
|
48
Articulation of Instructional Impact (How did your instruction impact the students' learning?) (InTASC Standard #8) |
The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop a deep understanding of content areas and their connections and to build skills for applying knowledge in meaningful ways. |
The teacher Uses instructional strategies to develop deep understanding & skills to apply knowledge. |
The teacher understands and uses an instructional strategy to encourage learners to develop an understanding of content areas and their connections and to build skills for applying knowledge in meaningful ways. |
The teacher does not demonstrate using instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop an understanding of content areas and their connections and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. |
|
Sensitivity to Cultural Differences and Learning Styles |
The teacher is intentional in improving learning for all students. Centers on teaching styles that invite collaborative learning, multiple abilities, and different learning styles and adopt alternative assessments. Demonstrates universal design and cultural responsiveness. |
Lesson modifications involve variations in pedagogy while adhering to standard assessments but recognizing inequalities in curriculum and assessment— minimal responsiveness to diverse learning styles. |
Teacher modifies lessons for select students (i.e., ELL, Special Ed). Infrequently uses differentiated instruction or universal design. Sporadically uses technology or alternative teaching methods to engage students. |
Teaching styles and practices are incongruent with student learning styles. Fails to demonstrate cultural responsiveness or universal design. Non-responsive to students' learning needs. |
|
49
Clinical Observational Feedback Form
Form used by Early Childhood, Elementary Secondary Education
Name of Student Teacher: School: Grade/Classroom: Date: Time in: Time out: Content observed: University Supervisor:
Comments will only be marked when it is applicable in the lesson.
Rating Scale: 3= On Target; 2= Developing; 1= Area for Focus; N/O= Not Observed.
Instructional Practice |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NA |
Observations/Clear Examples |
Planning (CAEP R1.3 InTASC #7) -clear lesson plans -connections to state standards -rigorous learning outcomes -accommodated differences-diverse teaching methods used to engage learners |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Assessments (CAEP R1.3 InTASC #6) -used pre and post assessments -used formative assessments to monitor student understanding |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Classroom Management (CAEP R1.1 InTASC #3) -evidence of routines and procedures -respectful learning environment -forms strong relationships with students |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Student Engagement- (CAEP R1.3 InTASC 8) -uses various techniques to foster engagement with students -smooth delivery of instruction to maximize student learning -questions elicit multiple responses such as choral, individual, written, shared, and group |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Rev. 2 (May 2025)
50
-builds off responses of students |
|
|
|
|
|
Differentiated Instruction (CAEP R1.1 InTASC #1 & #2) -identifies student areas of strengths and areas for improvement -creates flexible groupings -utilizes various instructional materials -multiple forms of assessment -provides explicit and systematic instruction using the gradual release model. |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Instructional Strategies (CAEP R1.3 InTASC #8) -organized and prepared -uses various teaching methods -honored diversity and equity -incorporated technology tools and resources -fostered active engagement |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Content Knowledge (CAEP R1.2 InTASC #4,5) -taught accurate information -chose discipline-specific, central concepts -meaningful, real-world experiences -effective use of research-based teaching strategies |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Professional Responsibility |
|
|
|
|
Observations/Clear Examples |
Overall Professionalism (CAEP R1.4 InTASC #9,10) -confidence, enthusiasm -punctuality, professional dress -integrity, respect -collaboration with mentor teacher, coach and colleagues |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
***For Literacy Instruction Only
Instructional Practice |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Observations/Clear Examples |
Oral Language -listening comprehension -collaborative conversations skills -opportunities to build understanding through peer discussion |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Phonemic Awareness -recognizing rhyming words -clapping syllables -blending, segmenting, and manipulating phonemes |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Phonics -sound-spelling patterns |
|
|
|
|
|
Rev. 2 (May 2025)
51
-word analysis -syllable patterns |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Fluency -reading accuracy and automaticity -prosody -fluency at letter, word, phrase and text level |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Vocabulary -modeling and use of academic words -morphology -connections between new words to known words |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Comprehension -relates ideas to experiences -inferencing -text structure and features |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Writing -grammar and language conventions -addresses a variety of purposes and audiences -writing process |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/O |
|
Things to Consider:
Things to Consider:
Things to Consider:
Strengths Observed:
Strengths Observed:
Strengths Observed:
Rev. 2 (May 2025)
52
How did this lesson impact Student Learning? |
What did you learn from the assessment and how will this guide your future lessons: |
Goals or Areas to Focus on Moving Forward: |
Rev. 2 (May 2025)
53
Definition of Rubric Performance Levels
The criteria for evaluating the competence of Teacher Preparation candidates are defined by the following four performance levels:
N/O - Not Observed
Indicates that the performance was not observed.
Level 1 – Area of Focus
Indicates the student teacher is just starting to learn the performance indicators and requires close supervision and support for further growth and application
Level 2 – Developing
Indicates the student teacher knows the basics of the performance indicators and can demonstrate them with some guidance
Level 3 – On Target
Indicates the student teacher has a grasp of the performance indicators and demonstrates them at a proficient level
Rev. 2 (May 2025)
54
Professional Growth and Goals
Student Teacher Mentor Teacher
Grade School Semester
Goals for the Semester |
Beginning of the semester goals: (Pick an area or two from the Observation form and reflect on what you want to focus on and how you will measure that you are making progress.) |
|
55
Mid-Term Check-in |
You are half-way through student teaching: What growth have you made in your area of focus? What other areas of growth have you made thus far? What do you want to keep working on to improve? Think about the feedback you have been given and your mid-assessment evaluation and observations thus far. |
|
Final Check-in |
You are ending your student teaching experience: What have you learned about yourself? How have you grown? What were the greatest challenges? What do you think you need to continue to set goals around and work on? |
|
56
SOR Module for IUI Field Experience/Student Teaching Handbooks
Overview of Science of Reading
Background and Rationale:
From the Indiana Department of Education: “During the 2023 legislative session the Indiana General Assembly enacted extensive legislation in HEA 1558 regarding implementation of curriculum and instructional practices grounded in the science of reading for students in grades pre-kindergarten through fifth grade” (IN DOE, January 2024).
Science of reading as defined in the state law HEA 1558:
SECTION 1. IC 20-18-2-17.5 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW SECTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023]: Sec. 17.5.
"Science of reading" means a vast, interdisciplinary body of scientifically based research that:
(1) requires the explicit, systematic inclusion of the following five (5) essential components:
(A) Phonemic awareness.
(B) Phonics.
(C) Fluency.
(D) Vocabulary.
(E) Comprehension;
(2) is supported by evidence that informs:
(A) how proficient reading and writing develop;
(B) why some students have difficulty with reading and writing; and
(C) how to effectively assess and teach reading and writing to improve outcomes for all students; and
(3) has a demonstrated record of success, and when implemented, leads to increased student competency in the areas of:
(A) phonemic awareness;
(B) phonics
(C) reading fluency;
(D) vocabulary development;
(E) oral language skills;
(F) reading comprehension; and
(G) writing and spelling.
Although IUB teacher education literacy courses have always provided comprehensive reading content (i.e., reading foundations knowledge and skills in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension), in the past the science of reading content was integrated throughout the courses and was not presented in the required fixed sequence and for the prescribed amounts of time devoted to the five separate skill areas, as required by the new legislation. Additionally, in January 2024, the IN DOE adopted the Praxis Teaching Reading: Elementary 5205 test, which contains advanced foundational content that previously was only offered to reading addition students training to be reading specialists.
57
SOR Module for IUI Field Experience/Student Teaching Handbooks
All Indiana University literacy and special education courses, field experiences, and student teaching must teach only state-approved science of reading methods.
Teacher candidates’ abilities to teach phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, writing, and assessment will be tested on the reading test that teachers must pass to be licensed in the state of Indiana.
IUB programs will be evaluated through classroom observations of student teachers during an on-site campus visit by TPI-US, the state-appointed science of reading company conducting the science of reading evaluations.
State-Prohibited Content Contrary to Science of Reading
Under the new legislation, IUB instructors and supervisors cannot refer to or recommend the following methods which have been specifically prohibited in the HEA 1558 state law:
Three-cueing systems
Running records
Miscue analysis
Balanced literacy models
Guided reading
Reading workshop
Leveled texts
Embedded/implicit phonics
Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA), Informal Reading Inventory (IRI), or Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI)
58
SOR Module for IUI Field Experience/Student Teaching Handbooks
Teaching Science of Reading
As of Fall 2024, all IUB literacy and special education coursework is aligned with the science of reading. Courses provide intensive preparation on science of reading features*:
* The following descriptors are excerpted from Indiana Department of Education High-Quality Curricular Materials criteria. These curriculum selection criteria provide descriptors for systematic and data-based instruction as well as Science of Reading components content knowledge. https://www.in.gov/doe/students/high-quality-curricular-materials-advisory-lists/
Systematic and Sequential Explicit Direct Instruction
All grade levels (or comprehensively within the school system) include a clear and consistent instructional framework that is systematic and sequential. The framework has a comprehensive scope and sequence and content that includes a direct order in which skills are presented and allow for continued practice to build automaticity, skills building from the simple to more complex, and how knowledge and skills build and connect across grade levels.
Explicit teacher language…, including concise and specific teacher language to introduce, define, or explain new skills through demonstration and modeling before students are asked to practice new skills.
Support for Multilingual Learners and Special Reading Needs
Includes Dylexia and Team-based Decision-Making in Multiple Tiers Systems of Support
Differentiated support to meet the needs of all students including, but not limited to, students with special learning needs and English learners (e.g., linguistic scaffolds).
Data-based Assessment to Drive Instruction
Formative assessments (e.g., classroom-based assessments, unit assessments, lesson-based summative) are included within the instructional framework to continuously monitor progress and identify the skill level and needs of each student (e.g., assessments in students’ home language when possible).
Five Essential Components, Plus Writing
Based on research in the five essential components for reading instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
Note: Materials cannot encourage three-cueing. MSV*1 cues or visual memory for word recognition or curriculum will be disqualified for approval.
1 MSV refers to the three-cueing model of reading that uses meaning drawn from the context, pictures, or syntax as the primary basis for teaching word recognition.
59
SOR Module for IUI Field Experience/Student Teaching Handbooks
Science of Reading Essential Components
(1) Phonemic Awareness
Instruction provides practical application of taught skills and is provided in a systematic, explicit, and teacher-directed model, including simple and complex phonological awareness tasks (e.g., recognizing rhyming words, clapping syllables, and blending and segmenting); conversations include the way sounds are made in the mouth (i.e., how the articulatory gestures of air flow, tongue and lip placement, vocal cord voicing are happening).
(2) Phonics
Specific lessons include the following features within the comprehensive curriculum across grade levels: explicit, systematic, and sequential instruction progresses from simple to more complex sound–spelling patterns and word analysis skills. Lessons include repeated modeling and opportunities for students to hear, say, write, and read sound and spelling patterns (e.g., sounds, words, sentences, reading within text); letter-sound correspondences are taught from simple to complex; phonics skills are practiced by applying phoneme-grapheme knowledge in decodable texts that match the phonics elements taught, securing phonic decoding; instruction focuses students’ attention to the structure of the word; the sequence of advanced word study includes all six syllable types, morphemes, and etymological influences (i.e., word origins); decoding and encoding high-frequency words is taught by attending to sound-symbol associations and not by memorizing whole words; and phonetically irregular high-frequency words are taught by identifying the regularly-spelled part and the irregularly-spelled part explicitly taught through decoding and encoding.
Note: …cannot encourage three-cueing, MSV cues, or visual memory for word recognition.
(3) Fluency
Specific lessons include the following features within the comprehensive curriculum across grade levels: instruction includes teacher-led modeling, oral reading by students, and immediate feedback; opportunities exist for students to practice reading fluency using controlled texts; fluency emphasizes reading accuracy and automaticity; skills are practiced in a variety of texts (e.g., narrative, informational, poetry, lists); and instruction explicitly acknowledges that automaticity with decoding is a necessary foundation for effective reading comprehension.
(4) Vocabulary
Specific lessons align to oral language development and oral language use and include the following features within the comprehensive curriculum across grade levels: demonstrate knowledge through analysis and synthesis of texts, present claims and clear information using grade-level language and conventions and draw on textual evidence to support valid inferences from a text; emphasize the relationship between oral language and written language through explicit instruction that progress from speech to print through a focus on phonetics and phonology,
60
SOR Module for IUI Field Experience/Student Teaching Handbooks
orthography, (e.g., decoding and encoding based on predictable word patterns) syllables, morphology, semantics, syntax, and pragmatics; the development of oral comprehension and oral language is provided as a foundational skill; and activities support the foundation for reading comprehension built through rich read-aloud experiences (for students who are still learning decoding).
Specific lessons align to vocabulary and include the following features within the comprehensive curriculum across grade levels: …frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions (e.g., small group, peer-to-peer, whole class) that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary; lessons are organized around a topic or topics to build students' vocabulary and support students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; instruction is explicit and includes vocabulary for Tier 2 and 3 words, as well as instruction in the context of texts (most Tier 1 words); instruction emphasizes robust conversations to support an understanding of literal and inferential comprehension of word knowledge within a text; and explicit instruction in morphology is provided; activities are provided that make connections between a new word or concept and other known words or concepts, relating ideas to experiences.
(5) Comprehension
Specific lessons align to reading comprehension and include the following features within the comprehensive curriculum across grade levels: activities are provided that make connections between a new word or concept and other known words or concepts, relating ideas to experiences; texts are organized around a topic or topics to build students' knowledge; a progression of focused research and writing projects are included to develop knowledge and understanding of a topic using texts and other source materials; and inferencing is explicitly taught within text, including opportunities for metacognition and use of appropriate and accurate background knowledge.
Specific lessons align to reading comprehension and include the following features within the comprehensive curriculum across grade levels: a foundation for reading comprehension is built through rich read-aloud experiences to develop background knowledge and vocabulary in subject areas (e.g., science and history); texts that are appropriately complex for the identified grade level according to the requirements outlined in the Indiana Academic standards are provided; a text analysis that provides complexity information is included; measures for determining complexity include quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as reader and task considerations; include read- aloud texts that allow sufficient opportunity for engagement with more complex texts than students could read themselves; texts are organized around a topic or topics to build students' knowledge; a progression of focused research and writing projects are included to develop knowledge and understanding of a topic using texts and other source materials; and inferencing is explicitly taught within text, including opportunities for metacognition and use of appropriate and accurate background knowledge instruction and activities include questions that are text dependent in order to build knowledge and include opportunities for both written and spoken responses; tasks are designed to build, apply, and integrate knowledge and skills in reading, writing, speaking, listening,
61
SOR Module for IUI Field Experience/Student Teaching Handbooks
and language through quality, grade-level complex texts; and explicit instruction using a variety of genre types and features to support comprehension and/or build content knowledge is included.
(6) Writing
Address the grammar and language conventions specified by the standards at each grade level and build on those standards from previous grade levels through the application and practice of those skills in the context of reading and writing about unit texts; instruction and activities support students to develop composition skills across multiple text types for a variety of purposes and audiences; materials include a clear scope and sequence for teaching conventions of print, grammar, and syntax (sentence structure) in reading and writing; materials are taught explicitly through a gradual release of responsibility (i.e., I do, we do, you do) and include sufficient time for modeling, planning, and brainstorming ideas orally before drafting; instruction is structured; and models and graphic organizers are provided frequently to support composition.
62
STUDENT TEACHING IMPROVEMENT PLAN
This Student Teaching Improvement Plan is created in order to support student teachers and provide specific instructions for student teachers to follow in order to successfully complete student teaching.
Intern: |
Date: |
Mentor: |
Coach: |
Block: IV |
School: |
>>> has strengths in the following areas:
The following expectation are to be met:
Insert exact and concrete expectations here in bullet form.
Insert exact and concrete expectations here in bullet form.
Insert exact and concrete expectations here in bullet form.
I have read and understand the items on this Student Teaching Improvement Plan. I understand that I must meet these expectations to the satisfaction of my coach and my mentor teacher in order to successfully complete and pass student teaching. I understand that my student teaching placement may end early and/or extended if the conditions listed above are not met.
Intern Signature |
|
Date |
Mentor Teacher Signature |
|
Date |
Coach Signature |
|
|
Clinical Experiences Coordinator Signature |
|
|
63
Student Teaching Experience Log
Student Teacher Name: |
|
Dates of Student Teaching: |
|
Mentor Teaching Name: |
|
Grade Level/ Subject: |
|
School: |
|
School District: |
|
Mentor Teacher Signature: |
|
Student Teacher Signature: |
|
Directions: At the end of each week of student teaching/practicum, record the number of hours to the nearest half- hour devoted to each category. Although there is no minimum requirement, 90 hours for an 8-week placement would be considered a minimum number of teaching hours. This form is required and must be kept up to date in order for the School of Education to be able to verify the number of actual hours for future licensure verification/certification. Total the hours in each category, have your mentor teacher sign the form and turn it into the University to document your student teaching experience. You will complete a separate form for each student teaching/practicum experience.
Number of Weeks |
Dates |
TEACHING: Time spent providing direct instruction to whole classes, small groups, or individuals. |
PREPARATION/PARTICIPATION: Time involved in planning, correcting papers, evaluating, home visitations, faculty meetings, in-services, parent conferences, attending assemblies & extra- curricular activities, home-room duties, study hall supervision, etc. |
Week 1 |
|
|
|
Week 2 |
|
|
|
Week 3 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
|
|
|
Week 5 |
|
|
|
Week 6 |
|
|
|
Week 7 |
|
|
|
Week 8 |
|
|
|
Week 9 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
Absences: |
Filled in as the Sub: |
|
|
64
Student Teaching Final Assessment – Part A
Student Teacher Semester/Year
School Grade Level
Subject Area Mentor Teacher Coach
The mentor teacher should complete this assessment during the final week of student teaching. The completed assessment must be shared with the student teacher during a conference. Both the mentor and student teacher should sign the completed form, which should be submitted to the university coach. Target levels are highlighted in blue
For each competency, please indicate the level of proficiency for your student teacher. If you are unable to evaluate the student teacher on a given indicator, please place an NA in the first column of that row where the indicator and standards are listed.
InTASC Standard #1: Learner Development: The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences |
||||
Uses knowledge of prerequisite relationships CAEP 1.1 |
Plans reflect little understanding of how students build on prior knowledge or develop complex concepts. |
Plans to access students’ prior knowledge and provide shared experiences. |
Demonstrates an understanding of how students’ conceptual frameworks develop and how their misconceptions for an area of knowledge can influence their learning. |
Knows from experience how children’s conceptual frameworks develop in an area of knowledge and plans so that misconceptions can surface and be dispelled. |
Knowledge of characteristics of age group CAEP 1.1 |
Shows beginning awareness of typical development or individual variation. |
Shows awareness of typical development and individual variation. |
Shows understanding of developmental stages progressions and ranges of individual variation within each domain--physical, social, emotional, moral and cognitive. |
Articulates the developmental levels of the children and profiles their individual variation. |
Knowledge of class’ history as a learning community CAEP 1.1 |
Building a profile of the class and their background knowledge. Starting to have ideas about how to |
Makes explicit connections to previous experiences |
Plans for students to make connections to previous experiences or lessons. Plans |
Predicts where connections are likely to occur based on experience with children. Predicts what new learning or performance mode is in |
65
|
stretch their learning and performances. |
or lessons. Demonstrates expanded learning and performance modes. |
to scaffold expanded learning and performance modes for the class. |
the learners’ zone of proximal development. |
Knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge CAEP 1.1 |
Knows that students have different skills and knowledge and knows ways to assessing these. |
Demonstrates skills and knowledge that are developmentally appropriate for the class. |
Identifies individual students’ zones of proximal development. Values and builds on the strengths, interests, or knowledge of individual students. |
Plans engagements that will meet students in their zone of proximal development and stretch their learning. |
Continuity CAEP 1.1 |
Lessons are related, but the planned learning engagements may not form a progression or build on prior knowledge. |
Lessons reflect the larger goals of the unit. Progression of activities in the unit is potentially meaningful. |
Lessons move students toward goals of unit. Progression of activities in the unit is clearly meaningful. Effectively sequences topics and concepts so that the students build on prior knowledge. |
Lessons designed to support students as they work their way through a cycle of social knowledge construction. |
Communicating with families CAEP 1.1 |
Reluctant to make contact with family except with concern for failure or misbehavior. |
Provides feedback to families about students’ progress according to school policy. |
Communicates with parents about students’ progress on a regular basis and seeks to develop cooperative partnerships in support of student learning and well-being. |
Partnerships with families support a parallel practice wherein students benefit from a consistency of approach both at home and at school. |
InTASC Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards. |
||||
Knowledge of students’ interests and cultural heritage CAEP 1.1 |
Gathers information about students’ interests and cultural backgrounds. |
Plans engagements that are culturally relevant and interesting to the students. |
Connects to students’ worlds. Shows understanding of students’ families, cultures, and communities. |
Bridges students’ worlds developing understanding among the students about their families, cultures, and community. |
Suitability for diverse students CAEP 1.1 |
Goals defined primarily for class as a whole. |
Begins to differentiate instruction according to learners’ stages of development, strengths, and interests. |
Designs instruction appropriate to students’ stages of development, strengths, and interests. |
Goals effectively address the diversity of learning needs so that learners progress along different pathways. |
Sensitivity to diversity CAEP 1.1 |
Relies on stereotypes to understand cultural and gender differences. |
Can demonstrate sensitivity to cultural and gender difference, but may be inconsistent. |
Communicates in ways that demonstrate a sensitivity to cultural and gender differences (e.g. appropriate eye contact, reading body language, responsiveness to different modes of communication). |
Creates a classroom environment where students show respect and sensitivity to each other and to adults. |
66
Strategies CAEP 1.1 |
Relies primarily on single teaching strategy and takes full responsibility for identifying resources for learning. |
Experiments with teaching and learning strategies and makes observations about how the strategies help the students to learn. Solicits students for input about what they can bring to the learning of the class (e.g. resources, knowledge). |
Uses multiple teaching and learning strategies to engage students in active learning that promotes critical thinking, problem solving, and performance capabilities and that helps students assume responsibility for identifying and using learning resources. |
Students effectively choose from an array of strategies to promote their own intellectual growth. |
Technology and media to sustain diversity and meet diverse needs
CAEP 1.5 ISTE Standards for Educators 3, 5, 6 |
Uses technology and media to disseminate information, activities, or resources with little or no attention paid to the diversity of students in the classroom. |
Demonstrates the occasional use of technology and media to differentiate educational materials according to the needs, abilities and backgrounds of diverse students in the classroom. |
Systematically uses technology and media to differentiate materials and provide additional individualized supports and scaffolding to facilitate the inclusion and growth for the range of diverse students in the classroom. |
Intentionally, responsively and consistently leverages technology and media to differentiate materials, provide supports and scaffolding, and provide opportunities for a range of students to connect with and build upon the unique needs, abilities and backgrounds of diverse students in the classroom. |
InTASC Standard #3: Learning Environments: The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation. |
||||
Collaboration, cooperation, and communication CAEP 1.1 |
Not attempting to develop students’ abilities to work in small groups. May be teaching the interested students and losing the remaining students. |
Desires collaborative working arrangements, but is only partially successful in orchestrating groups. |
Organizes, prepares students for, and monitors independent and group work that allows for full and varied participation of all individuals. |
Establishes a culture wherein students are engaged and on-task in all variety of group and individual work. Students are aware of each other’s needs and know when it is appropriate to help one another. |
Setting up an interactive learning environment CAEP 1.1 |
The learning environment is not designed to be interactive. |
Occasionally organizes interactive learning activities. |
Organizes the classroom so that learning resources invite student inquiry and creative thinking. Uses such strategies as learning centers, experiments, manipulatives, games, invitations, bulletin boards, or computer stations to promote active learning supported by peer interaction. |
Promotes student responsibility for creating the learning environment, encouraging students to reflect on the quality of the learning environment and to share their problems or questions, to create invitations or challenges, and to share suggestions for needed resources or experiences. |
Intentional use of technology and media in context |
Uses technology and media as an add-on or reward (unrelated to broader educational goals), to |
Brings appropriate technology and media to learning experiences that connect with broader |
Leverages technology and media as a way to enhance learning experiences and deepen inquiry, serve as a trigger for classroom |
Facilitates a classroom culture in which technology and media regularly serve as a resource for deep inquiry and methodical |
67
CAEP 1.5 ISTE Standards for Educators 5, 6 |
reinforce basic skills, or solely as a medium for transfer of information (such as slides to accompany a lecture). |
educational goals and support student learning. |
dialogue, and engage students in the curation of content and the creation of meaning. |
collaboration, classroom dialogue, reflective practice, and the curation of content and the creation of meaning. |
InTASC Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content. |
||||
Knowledge of content CAEP 1.1 |
Displays limited or inaccurate content knowledge. Not yet addressing significant concepts or processes of inquiry. |
Displays a beginning understanding of in-depth content knowledge, concepts, processes of inquiry, and ways of knowing central to a discipline or unit . |
Displays accurate, in-depth content knowledge, working with major concepts, processes of inquiry, and ways of knowing central to a discipline or unit of study. |
Displays sophisticated, in-depth content knowledge. Works easily with major concepts, processes of inquiry, and ways of knowing central to a discipline or unit. |
Making content comprehensible CAEP 1.1 |
Rarely develops specific examples, presentations, or experiences to communicate knowledge. |
Plans concrete examples and experiences using manipulatives and authentic materials. |
Develops clear, accurate presentations and representations of concepts. Effectively uses multiple examples and explanations that capture key ideas and link to students’ prior knowledge. |
Can present clear and accurate presentations extemporaneously, responding to students’ questions and understanding. |
InTASC Standard #5: Application of Content: The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. |
||||
Ability to integrate knowledge CAEP 1.1 |
Plans to develop students’ skills and subject area knowledge simultaneously. |
Creates learning experiences that have interdisciplinary potential. |
Creates interdisciplinary learning experiences that allow students to integrate knowledge, skills, and methods of inquiry from several subject areas. |
Prepares to support students in demonstrating integrated knowledge, skills, and methods of inquiry. |
Multiple perspectives CAEP 1.1 |
Content is presented without discussion of its relationship to lived experience, other disciplines, or cultural norms. Individual differences are ignored. |
Demonstrates an awareness of multiple perspectives and opens discussions about subject matter to the class so that the multiple perspectives of the learners can emerge. |
Brings multiple perspectives to the discussion of subject matter, including attention to students’ personal, family, and community experiences and cultural norms and other disciplines. Individual differences are respected. |
Strategically introduces resources and experiences that challenge the learners beliefs and assumptions about common understandings thereby creating a community where critical thinking is a habit. |
InTASC Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision making. |
||||
Variety of assessment strategies CAEP 1.1 |
Exploring a variety of formal and informal assessments. |
Uses more than one form of assessment during a unit of study. |
Appropriately uses a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques (e.g. observation, |
Plans a system of assessment that uses a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques. |
68
|
|
|
portfolios, teacher-made tests, performance tasks, projects, student self-assessments, peer assessments, and standardized tests) to enhance his or her knowledge of learners. |
|
Monitoring for understanding CAEP 1.1 |
Makes few attempts at determining whether students are understanding. |
Sometimes monitors for understanding, but may not provide enough opportunities for students to share their perceptions and make connections. |
Probes for learner understanding. Helps students articulate their ideas and thinking processes. |
Teaches students to monitor their own comprehension and to ask questions when their understanding breaks down. |
Evaluation of progress and performance CAEP 1.1 |
Records minimally support student evaluation. Feedback focused on end of grading period. |
Ample documentation of student work. Conferences are intermittent and teacher directed. |
Maintains useful records of student work and performance and can communicate student progress knowledgeably and responsibly on an ongoing basis. |
Students readily give and receive feedback to/from teachers and peers to evaluate progress. |
Use of research and evidence to measure P-12 students’ progress CAEP 1.2 |
No evidence that the measurement and/or analysis of P-12 students’ progress is ground in either research or evidence |
Measurement and /or analysis of P-12 students’ progress is often grounded in evidence but little evidence of the use of research |
Measurement and analysis of P-12 students’ progress is consistently grounded in evidence and sometimes in research |
Measurement and analysis of P-12 students’ progress is consistently grounded research and evidence |
Applies content and pedagogical knowledge in outcome assessments in response to state and national standards CAPE 1.3 |
Ability to apply content and pedagogical knowledge in development of outcomes assessments is not apparent. |
Applies content and pedagogical knowledge in the development and implementation of outcome assessment but connection to state and national standards is not apparent. |
Applies content and pedagogical knowledge to develop and implement outcome assessment that address state and national standards |
Consistently applies a high level of content and pedagogical knowledge to develop and implement outcome assessment that address state and national standards |
InTASC Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context. |
||||
Lesson or unit structure CAEP 1.1 |
Lesson or unit lacks clearly defined structure, or the structure is chaotic. Time allocations are unrealistic. |
Lesson or unit has a recognizable structure that consistently makes the teacher the central to the learning activities. Most time allocations are reasonable. |
Lesson or unit has a clearly defined structure (i.e. workshop or inquiry cycle) that turns learning over to students at least part of the time through activities and reflective work. Time allocations are reasonable. |
Lesson or unit structure is varied and clear, and allows for different pathways according to student needs. |
69
Quality learning engagements CAEP 1.1 |
Learning engagements encourage conformity. All students are expected to produce the same performance. |
Learning engagements demonstrate how students can work in a variety of modes to accomplish the same learning. |
Learning engagements are open-ended, providing students choices about their modes of performance and encouraging different, but equivalent performances. |
Learning engagements address variation in students’ learning patterns and performance modes and operate on multiple levels to meet the developmental and individual needs of diverse learners. |
Meaningfulness CAEP 1.1 |
Lessons are planned without specifying expectations or goals for the students. |
Goals are based on general sense of what will interest learners and meet their needs. |
Goals are based on assessment of learners and designed to meet learners’ developmental needs and interests. |
Goals are articulated and explained in relationship to what the teacher knows about the students and their developmental needs and interests. |
Address rigorous college and career-ready standards. CAEP 1.4 |
Does not demonstrate an awareness of the need to address college and career-ready standards |
Is aware of the need to address college and career-ready standards and sometimes incorporates these standards in lessons |
Address college and career- ready standards in most lessons. |
Lessons consistently address rigorous college and career-ready standards |
Planning self-directed learning experiences for students with technology and media that provide opportunities for creatively solving problems and communicating ideas
CAEP 1.5 ISTE Standards for Educators 5, 6, 7 |
Learning experiences are planned that are neither self-directed nor provide opportunities for creative problem solving and communications with technology. |
Learning experiences are planned that may provide opportunities for teacher-directed problem solving or communicating ideas with technology and media through a single method of demonstrating competency and is not based on prior assessment data and relationships with individual students. |
Plans self-directed learning experiences for students that involve creative problem solving and communicating solutions, but does not provide for multiple methods of demonstrating competency or is not based on prior assessment data and relationships with individual students. |
Plans self-directed learning experiences for students with multiple methods of demonstrating competency through creative problem solving and communicating solutions based on prior assessment data and relationships with individual students. |
InTASC Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. |
||||
Depth CAEP 1.1 |
Presents a single viewpoint or theory in depth. Textbook dependent. |
Supplements textbook instruction. Finds different ways to explore subject matter concepts. |
Represents and uses differing viewpoints, theories, “ways of knowing” and methods of inquiry to teach subject matter concepts. |
Expects students, in their work, to present multiple viewpoints, and use multiple ways of knowing. |
70
Teacher as researcher CAEP 1.1 CAEP 1.2 |
Systematically gathers and analyses data from students and classrooms. |
Based on analysis of data, formulates a hypothesis about student learning and designs instruction to check. |
Practices inquiry by systematically gathering and analyzing data from the classroom and students, and experimenting with, reflecting on, and revising practice. |
Articulate about how their inquiry leads to better instruction and further inquiry about teaching and learning in the classroom. |
InTASC Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice: The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner. |
||||
Enhancement of content knowledge and pedagogical skills CAEP 1.1 |
Professional development activities to enhance knowledge or skill not a priority. |
Participates in professional activities to a limited extent when they are convenient. Extends personal knowledge of content through resource materials. |
Seeks opportunities for professional development to enhance content knowledge and skills. Reads professional literature and talks with other teachers to support his/her own development as a learner and teacher. Extends personal understanding of content through planning and interaction with children. |
Seeks out opportunities for professional development and contributes by presenting at professional meetings and conferences. |
Self-assessment CAEP 1.1 |
Provides occasional opportunities for reflection or self-assessment. Teacher evaluates and defines goals. |
Helps students understand purpose and value of self-assessment. Teacher and students are partners in identifying strengths and needs. |
Uses assessment strategies to involve learners in self-assessment activities, to help them become aware of their strengths and needs, and to encourage them to set personal goals for learning. |
Students have a repertoire of self-assessment strategies that they use routinely to define their personal goals. |
Uses research and evidence to develop an understanding of their own professional practice CAEP 1.2 |
No evidence that research or evidence is used to develop an understanding of professional practice |
Development of an understanding of own professional practice is often grounded in evidence but little evidence of the use of research |
Development of an understanding of own professional practice is consistently grounded in evidence and sometimes in research |
Development of an understanding of own professional practice is consistently grounded in evidence and research |
Technology as a resource for professional development and community participation
CAEP 1.5 |
Rarely and haphazardly uses technology to seek out resources and professional growth opportunities. |
Uses technology to seek out new information and resources (including colleagues) to address specific challenges and problems as they arise. |
Methodically seeks out new information and resources (including colleagues) with technology in order to extend and adapt their teaching practices to meet the needs of diverse learners. |
Intentionally engages in technology-facilitated social networks and resources in order to learn from and contribute to ongoing and supportive communities of practice. |
71
ISTE Standards for Educators 1, 2, 4 |
|
|
|
|
InTASC Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration: The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning, to collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth, and to advance the profession. |
||||
Collaborating with colleagues to improve learning and conditions CAEP 1.1 |
Prefers to keep to self. Reluctant to share ideas or discuss problems with peers or mentor teacher. |
Realizes advantages of another point of view. Begins to confide in a few others. |
Openly shares ideas, cooperates with mentor teacher and peers in solving problems in the classroom and school. |
Takes a proactive stance. Initiates conversations and alerts colleagues to situations that may be of concern. |
72
IU School of Education – IUI Student Teaching
FINAL ASSESSMENT – Part B
English/Language Arts NCTE 2012 Standards
Student Teacher Semester/Year School Grade Level Subject Area Coach Mentor Teacher
This assessment should be completed by the mentor teacher during the last week of student teaching. The completed assessment should be shared with the student teacher during a conference. Both the mentor and student teacher should sign the completed form, which should be submitted to the university coach.
For each competency, please indicate the level of proficiency for your student teacher. Comments may be provided in the space below each competency row.
1—Needs Support
Student teacher is struggling and will require significant support if placed in charge of a classroom.
2—TARGET Level
Student teacher will initially need some assistance when beginning a professional career but has the skills, knowledge and/or dispositions of a beginning teacher.
3—Proficient
Student teacher is clearly ready to work as a teacher beginning a professional career.
NA (Unable to Determine)
Not enough evidence available. (Please be sure to comment.)
|
||
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of English language arts subject matter content that specifically includes literature and multimedia texts as well as knowledge of the nature of adolescents as readers. (NCTE STD #1) |
||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Shows a lack of understanding of how the English language arts curriculum, teachers, students and education in general are influenced by culture, social events, and issues. |
Makes meaningful connection between the English/language arts curriculum and development in culture, society and education. |
Makes meaningful and creative connections between the English/language arts curriculum and development in culture, society and education. |
Shows little knowledge of language structure and conventions in creating and critiquing print and non-print texts. |
Demonstrates knowledge of language structure and conventions by creating and critiquing own print and nonprint texts and by assisting students tin such activities. |
Uses a variety of ways to assist students in creating and critiquing a wide range of print and nonprint texts for multiple purposes and help students understand the relationship between symbols and meaning. |
Shows a lack of knowledge of ways to discover and create meaning from texts. |
Discovers and creates meaning from texts and guides students in the same processes. |
Uses a wide range of approaches for helping students to draw upon their past experiences, sociocultural backgrounds, interests, capabilities and understanding to make meaning of texts. |
73
Shows little knowledge of, or use of, a variety of teaching applications for works representing a broad historical and contemporary spectrum of United States, British, and world literatures. |
Knows and uses a variety of teaching applications for works representing a broad historical and contemporary spectrum of United States, British, and world literatures. |
Demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of, and an ability to use, varied teaching applications for works representing a broad historical and contemporary spectrum of United States, British, and world literatures. |
Shows little knowledge of, or use of, a variety of teaching applications of works from a wide variety of genres and cultures, works by female authors, and works by authors of color. |
Knows and uses a variety of teaching applications for works from a wide variety of genres and cultures, works by female authors, and works by authors of color. |
Demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of, and an ability to use, varied teaching applications from a wide variety of genres and cultures, works by female authors, and works by authors of colors. |
Exhibits a lack of understanding of the influence of media on culture and on people’s actions and communication. |
Understands how media can influence constructions of a text’s meaning, and how experiencing various media can enhance students’ composing processes, communication and learning. |
Understands media’s influences on culture and people’s actions and communications, reflecting that knowledge not only in own work, but also in teaching. |
Shows little understanding of how to construct meaning from media and nonprint texts. |
Shows an ability to construct meaning from media and nonprint texts, and to assist students in learning these processes. |
Uses a variety of approaches for teaching students how to construct meaning from media and nonprint texts and integrates learning opportunities into classroom experiences that promote composing and responding to such texts. |
Shows limited experience in examining, and selecting resources for instruction, such as textbooks, other print materials, videos, films, records, and software, appropriate for supporting the teaching of English language arts. |
Examines and selects resources for instruction such as textbooks, other print materials, videos, films, records, and software, appropriate for supporting the teaching of English language arts. |
Understands the purposes and characteristics of different kinds of curricula and related teaching resources and selects or creates instructional materials that are consistent with what is currently known about student learning in English language arts. |
|
||
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of English language arts subject matter content that specifically includes language and writing as well as knowledge of adolescents as language users (NCTE STD #2) |
||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Shows a lack of respect for and little knowledge of diversity in language use, patterns, and dialects across cultures, ethnic groups, geographic groups, geographic regions, and social roles. |
Knows and respects diversity in languages use, patterns, and dialects across cultures, ethnic groups, geographic regions and social roles and show attention to accommodating such diversity in teaching. |
Shows extensive knowledge of how and why language varies and changes in different regions, across different cultural groups, and across different time periods and incorporates that knowledge into classroom instruction and assessment that acknowledges and shows consistent respect for language diversity. |
74
Demonstrates little knowledge of the evolution of the English language and the historical influences on its various forms. |
Demonstrates knowledge of the evolution of the English language and the historical influences on its various forms and uses this knowledge in teaching. |
Demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the evolution of the English language and historical influences on its forms and how to integrate this knowledge into student learning. |
Exhibits a lack of knowledge of English grammars and their application to teaching. |
Uses knowledge of English grammars in teaching students both oral and written forms of the language. |
Incorporates an in-depth knowledge of English grammars into teaching skills that empower students to compose and to respond effectively to written, oral, and other texts. |
|
||
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students. (NCTE STD #3) |
||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Shows little evidence in using English/language arts in helping students to become familiar with their own and other’s cultures. |
Use English/language arts to help students become familiar with their own and others’ cultures. |
Uses English/language arts extensively and creatively to help their students become more familiar with their own and others, cultures. |
Engages in few practices designed to assist students in developing habits of critical thinking and judgment. |
Uses practices designed to assist students in developing habits of critical thinking and judgment. |
Designs and implements instruction and assessments that assist students in developing habits of critical thinking. |
Demonstrates little evidence of promoting the arts and humanities in the learning of the students. |
Engages students in activities that demonstrate the role of arts and humanities in learning. |
Plans and carries out frequent and extended learning experiences that integrate arts and humanities into the daily learning of students. |
Demonstrates a limited knowledge of students’ language acquisition and development processes. |
Uses knowledge of students’ language acquisition and development as a basis for designing appropriate learning activities that promote student learning. |
Integrates knowledge of students; language acquisition and development into instruction and assessment designed to enhance students; learning. |
Demonstrates little understanding of how reading, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and thinking are interrelated areas of English/language arts. |
Demonstrates how reading writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and thinking are interrelated in students;’ leaning of English/language arts. |
Designs, implements, and assesses instruction that engages all students in reading, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and thinking as interrelated dimension of the learning experience in English /language arts. |
Shows limited ability to respond to and interpret what is read. |
Responds to and interprets in varied ways, what is read, teaching students how to do this as well. |
Integrates into teaching continuous use of carefully designed learning experiences that encourage students to demonstrate their ability to read and respond to a range of texts of varying complexity and difficulty. |
75
Uses few strategies to comprehend, interpret, evaluate, and appreciate text. |
Uses a wide variety of strategies to comprehend, interpret, evaluate and appreciate texts and teach those strategies to students. |
Integrates into students' learning experiences a wide variety of strategies to interpret, evaluate, and appreciate texts and assesses the effectiveness of such strategies in promoting student learning. |
Shows little knowledge of, or use of, a variety of teaching applications of numerous works specifically written for older children or younger adults. |
Knows and uses a variety of teaching applications for numerous works specifically written for older children or younger adults. |
Demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of, and an ability to use, varied teaching applications from numerous works specifically written for older children or younger adults. |
Shows little knowledge of, or use of, a variety of teaching applications for a range of works of literary theory and criticism. |
Knows and uses a variety of teaching applications for a range of works of literary theory and criticism. |
Demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of, and an ability to use, varied teaching applications for a range of works of literary theory and criticism. |
Uses few interdisciplinary teaching strategies and materials. |
Integrates interdisciplinary teaching strategies and materials into the teaching and learning process for students. |
Works with teachers in other content areas to help students connect important ideas, concepts, and skills with English language arts with similar ones in other disciplines. |
Shows limited ability to create learning environments that promote respect for, and support of, individual differences of ethnicity, race, language, culture, gender and ability. |
Creates and sustains leaning environments that promote respect for, and support of, individual differences of ethnicity, race, language, culture, gender and ability. |
Creates opportunities for students to analyze how social context affects language and to monitor he/her own language use and behavior in terms of demonstrating respect for individual differences of ethnicity, race, language, culture, gender, and ability. |
Demonstrates limited ability to engage students in making meaning of texts through personal responses. |
Engages students in making meaning of texts through personal response. |
Engages students in discovering their personal response to texts and ways to connect such responses to other larger meanings and critical stances. |
Demonstrates limited ability to provide students with relevant reading strategies that permit access to, and understanding of, a wide range of print and nonprint texts. |
Demonstrates that students can select appropriate reading strategies that permit access to, and understanding of, a wide range of print and nonprint texts. |
Demonstrates how reading comprehension strategies are flexible for making and monitoring meaning in both print and nonprint texts and teaches a wide variety of such strategies to all students. |
Fails to use formal and informal assessment activities and instruments to evaluate student work for literature and reading. |
Uses a variety of formal and informal assessment activities and instruments to evaluate processes and products. |
Establishes criteria and develops strategies for assessment that allows all students to understand what they know and can do in light of their instructional experiences. |
76
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Shows little knowledge of semantics, syntax, morphology and phonology or their application to teaching. |
Uses knowledge of semantics, syntax, morphology, and phonology in teaching students how to use oral and written languages. |
Demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of semantics, syntax, morphology, and phonology through effective use of languages and integrates that knowledge into teaching students to use oral and written languages effectively. |
Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the influence that language and visual images have on thinking and composing. |
Uses understanding of the influence of language and visual images on thinking and composing in own work and in teaching. |
Creates opportunities and develops strategies that permit students to demonstrate, through their worn work, the influence of language and visual images on thinking and composing. |
Shows infrequent uses of writing, speaking and observing as major forms of inquiry, reflection and expression. |
Uses writing, speaking and observing as major forms of inquiry, reflection and expression in teaching. |
Creates opportunities and develops strategies for enabling students to demonstrate how they integrate writing, speaking, and observing to their own learning processes. |
Exhibits infrequent uses of the processes of composing to create various forms of oral, visual, and written literacy. |
Uses composing processes in creating various forms or oral, visual and written literacy of his/her own and engages students in these processes. |
Demonstrates a variety of ways to teach students composing processes that result in his/her creating various forms of oral, visual, and written literacy. |
Uses writing, visual images, and speaking for a variety of audiences and purposes. |
Demonstrates, through own learning and teaching, how writing, visual images and speaking can effectively perform a variety of functions for varied audiences and purposes. |
Engages students in activities that provide opportunities for demonstrating their skills in writing, speaking and creating visual images for a variety of audiences and purposes. |
Uses a limited number of writing strategies to generate meaning and clarify understanding. |
Uses a variety of writing strategies to generate meaning and clarify understanding and draw upon that knowledge and skill in teaching. |
Develops in students an ability to use a wide variety of effective composing strategies to generate meaning and to clarify understanding. |
Produces a very limited number of forms of written discourse and shows little understanding of how written discourse can influence thought and action. |
Produces different forms of written discourse and understand how written discourse can influence thought and action. |
Teaches students to make appropriate selections from different forms of written discourse for a variety of audiences and purposes and to assess the effectiveness of their products in influencing thought and action. |
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for composing texts (i.e., oral, written, and visual) to promote learning for all students. (NCTE STD #4)
77
Demonstrates infrequent use of instruction that promotes understanding of varied uses and purposed for language in communication. |
Engages students in learning experiences that consistently emphasizes varied uses and purposes for language in communication. |
Integrates throughout the English language arts curriculum learning opportunities in which students demonstrate their abilities to use language for a variety of purposes in communication. |
Fails to use formal and informal assessment activities and instruments to evaluate student work for composition. |
Uses a variety of formal and informal assessment activities and instruments to evaluate processes and products. |
Establishes criteria and develops strategies for assessment that allows all students to understand what they know and can do in light of their instructional experiences. |
|
||
Candidates plan, implement, assess, and reflect on research-based instruction that increases motivation and active student engagement, builds sustained learning of English language arts, and responds to diverse students’ context-based needs. (NCTE STD #5) |
||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Shows little evidence of creating an inclusive and supportive learning environment in which all students can engage in learning. |
Creates an inclusive and supportive learning environment in which all students can engage in learning. |
Creates and sustains an inclusive and supportive learning environment in which all students can engage in learning. |
Demonstrates little understanding of how reading, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and thinking are interrelated areas of English/language arts |
Demonstrates how reading writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and thinking are interrelated in students;’ leaning of English/language arts. |
Designs, implements, and assesses instruction that engages all students in reading, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and thinking as interrelated dimension of the learning experience in English /language arts |
Shows a lack of knowledge of the major sources of research and theory related to English language arts. |
Uses major sources of research and theory related to English language arts to support teaching decisions |
Reflects on own teaching performances in light of research on, and theories of, how students compose and responds to text and make adjustments in teaching as appropriate. |
Shows little evidence of using teacher-researcher models of classroom inquiry. |
Uses teacher-researcher models of classroom inquiry to inform own study and teaching. |
Uses teacher-researcher models of classroom inquiry to analyze own teaching practices so they can better understand what enables students to speak, listen, write, read, enact and view effectively in varying learning situations. |
78
|
||
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of how theories and research about social justice, diversity, equity, student identities, and schools as institutions can enhance students’ opportunities to learn in English Language Arts. (NCTE STD #6) |
||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Demonstrates little knowledge of how to recognize the impact of cultural, economic, political and social environments on language. |
Demonstrates an awareness in teaching the impact of cultural, economic, political and social environments on language |
Uses both theory and practice in helping students understand the impact of cultural, economic, political and social environments on languages. |
Demonstrates limited ability to engage students effectively in discussions for the purposes of interpreting and evaluating ideas presented through oral, written and/or visual forms. |
Engages students often in meaningful discussion for the purposes of interpreting and evaluating ideas presented through oral, written and/or visual forms. |
Helps students to participate in dialogue within a community of learners by making explicit for all students the speech and related behaviors appropriate for conversing about ideas presented through oral written, and/pr visual forms. |
Shows limited ability to enable students to respond critically to different media and communications technologies. |
Engages students in critical analysis of different media and communications technologies. |
Integrates throughout the English language arts curriculum learning opportunities in which students demonstrate their abilities to use language for a variety of purposed in communication. |
|
||
Candidates are prepared to interact knowledgeably with students, families, and colleagues based on social needs and institutional roles, engage in leadership and/or collaborative roles in English Language Arts professional learning communities and actively develop as professional educators. (NCTE STD #7) |
||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Demonstrates inconsistency in reflective practice and seldom pursues professional growth and collaboration with colleagues and involvement with appropriate professional organization. |
Demonstrates reflective practice, involvement in professional organizations, and collaboration with both faculty and other student teachers. |
Uses the results of reflective practice not only to adapt instruction and behavior to assist all students to learn but also to design a well-conceived plan for professional development that features collaboration with the academic community, professional organization, and others. |
Uses few interdisciplinary teaching strategies and materials. |
Integrates interdisciplinary teaching strategies and materials into the teaching and learning process for students. |
Works with teachers in other content areas to help students connect important ideas, concepts, and skills with English language arts with similar ones in other disciplines. |
79
IU School of Education – IUI Student Teaching
FINAL ASSESSMENT – Part B
Secondary Mathematics NCTM 2020 Standards
Student Teacher Semester/Year
School Grade Level
Subject Area Mentor Teacher Coach
This assessment should be completed by the mentor teacher during the last week of student teaching. The completed assessment should be shared with the student teacher during a conference. Both the mentor and student teacher should sign the completed form, which should be submitted to the university coach.
For each competency, please indicate the level of proficiency for your student teacher. Comments may be provided in the space below each competency row.
1—Needs Support
Student teacher is struggling and will require significant support if placed in charge of a classroom.
2—TARGET Level
Student teacher will initially need some assistance when beginning a professional career but has the skills, knowledge and/or dispositions of a beginning teacher.
3—Proficient
Student teacher is clearly ready to work as a teacher beginning a professional career.
NA (Unable to Determine)
Not enough evidence available. (Please be sure to comment.)
Standards Competency |
Level 3 |
Level 2 Target |
Level 1 |
Comments or NA |
Identify and use |
Student teacher identifies |
Student teacher is |
Student teacher pays |
|
student |
and uses students’ |
beginning the process of |
little or not attention to |
|
differences to |
individual and group |
understanding how the |
student differences |
|
plan (NCTM 3a) |
differences to plan rigorous and engaging mathematics instruction |
diversity, strengths, and identities of students influence how students |
when planning |
|
|
that support students’ |
learn, and consider |
|
|
|
meaningful participation |
some of these factors in |
|
|
|
and learning |
planning |
|
|
Identify and use |
Student teachers identify |
Student teacher |
Student teacher’s |
|
students’ |
and use students’ |
identifies and uses |
planning does not |
|
mathematical |
mathematical strengths to |
students’ mathematical |
support the regular use |
|
strengths to |
plan rigorous and |
strengths for most |
of students’ |
|
plan (NCTM 3b) |
engaging mathematics instruction that supports students’ meaningful |
planning. |
mathematical strengths for planning |
|
|
participation and learning. |
|
|
|
Use of |
Student teacher |
Student teacher |
Student teacher does |
|
knowledge and |
understands that teachers’ |
demonstrates in some |
not demonstrate |
|
understanding |
interactions impact |
lessons an awareness of |
awareness of that |
|
of impact of |
individual students by |
his/her influence and |
his/her tone, |
|
Student |
influencing and |
ability to make a |
expressions, words, |
|
teacher’s |
reinforcing students’ |
positive impact through |
and actions influence |
|
interaction on students when |
mathematical identities, positive or negative, and plan experiences and |
planning and teaching |
students’ mathematical identities and beliefs. |
80
planning (NCTM 3c) |
instruction to develop and foster positive mathematical identities |
|
|
|
Learning goals (NCTM 4a) |
Student teacher establishes rigorous mathematics learning goals for students based on mathematics standards and practices. |
Student teacher establishes clear mathematical learning goals for students which are often but not always based on mathematics standards. |
Student teacher struggles to establish clear learning goals |
|
Developing tasks (NCTM 4b) |
Student teacher selects or develops and implements high cognitive demand tasks to engage students in mathematical learning experiences that promote reasoning and sense making. |
Student teacher selects or develops and implements tasks which often engage students in experiences that promote reasoning and sense making. |
Student teacher’s tasks often do not engage students in experiences that promote reasoning and sense making |
|
Mathematics Tools (NCTM 4c) |
Student teacher selects mathematics specific tools, including technology, to support students’ learning, understanding, and application of mathematics and to integrate tools into instruction. |
Student teacher uses mathematics specific tools in some lessons but is still learning how to effectively integrate the tools into instruction. |
Student teacher seldom if ever uses mathematic specific tools in lessons. |
|
Mathematical Representations (NCTM 4d) |
Student teacher selects and uses mathematical representations to engage students in examining understandings of mathematics concepts and the connections to other representations |
Student teacher is beginning to learn how to uses mathematical representation to engage students in examining understanding of mathematics concepts. |
Student teacher seldom if ever uses mathematical representations to engage students in examining understanding of mathematics concepts. |
|
Using evidence of student thinking (NCTM 4e) |
Student teacher uses multiple student responses, potential challenges, and misconceptions, and highlights students’ thinking as a central aspect of mathematics teaching and learning |
Student teacher uses some student responses, potential challenges, and/or misconceptions as aspect of teaching and learning. |
Student teacher seldom uses student responses, potential challenges, or misconceptions as aspect of teaching. |
|
Using conceptual understanding (NCTM 4f) |
Student teacher uses conceptual understanding to build procedural fluency for students through instruction that includes explicit connections between concepts and procedures |
Student teacher uses conceptual understanding often to build procedural fluency but is just beginning to include explicit connections between concepts and procedures. |
Student teacher’s teaching is mainly procedures with little or no conceptual understanding addressed. |
|
Questioning skills (NCTM 4g) |
Student teacher poses purposeful questions to facilitate discourse among students that ensures that |
Student teacher poses questions to facilitate discourse which is often |
Student teachers seldom if ever poses questions to facilitate discourse. |
|
81
|
each student learns rigorous mathematics and builds a shared understanding of mathematical ideas. |
between Student teacher and student. |
|
|
Assessment (NCTM 5) |
Student teacher assesses and uses evidence of students’ learning of rigorous mathematics to improve instruction and subsequent student learning. |
Student teacher assesses students’ learning of mathematics and attempts to use the evidence to improve instruction. |
Student teacher assesses students’ learning of mathematics but does not use the evidence to improve instruction |
|
Student teacher reflection (NCTM 6b) |
Student teacher reflects on his/her impact on students’ mathematical identities and develops professional learning goals that promote students’ positive mathematical identities |
Student teacher reflects on his/her impact on students’ mathematical identities and develops some professional learning goals. |
Student teacher struggles to reflect on his/her impact on students’ mathematical identities. |
|
Communication with families (NCTM 6c) |
Student teacher communicates with families to share and discuss strategies for ensuring the mathematical success of their children |
Student teacher has some communications with families about the mathematical success of their children |
Student teacher avoids communicating with families. |
|
Collaborate with colleagues (NCTM 6d) |
Student teacher collaborates with colleagues to grow professionally and support student learning of mathematics. |
Student teacher makes some attempts to collaborate with colleagues |
Student teacher avoids interacting and collaborating with colleagues |
|
Mathematics Content Knowledge |
||||
Concepts in Number (NCTM 1a) |
Student teacher demonstrates and applies understandings of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of number including flexibly applying procedures, using real and rational numbers in contexts, developing solution strategies, and evaluating the correctness of conclusions |
Student teacher has knowledge of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of number including flexibly applying procedures, using real and rational numbers in contexts, developing solution strategies, and evaluating the correctness of conclusions and is working to apply this knowledge. |
Student teacher struggles and/or has misconceptions about major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of number |
|
Concepts in algebra and functions (NCTM 1b) |
Student teacher demonstrates and apply understandings of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of algebra and functions including how |
Student teacher has knowledge of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of algebra and functions but does not always |
Student teacher struggles and/or has some misconceptions about major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and |
|
82
|
mathematics can be used systematically to represent patterns and relationships including proportional reasoning, to analyze change, and to model everyday events and problems of life and society |
model everyday events and problems of life. |
applications of algebra and functions |
|
Concepts of Calculus (NCTM 1c) |
Student teacher demonstrates and applies understandings of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of calculus including the mathematical study of the calculation of instantaneous rates of change and the summation of infinitely many small factors to determine some whole. |
Student teacher has knowledge of major mathematics concepts, procedures, and applications of calculus |
Student teacher struggles and/or has some misconceptions about major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of calculus |
|
Statistics and probability (NCTM 1d) |
Student teacher demonstrates and applies understandings of statistical thinking and the major concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of statistics and probability, including how statistical problem solving and decision making depend on understanding, explaining, and quantifying the variability in a set of data to make decisions. |
Student teacher has knowledge of statistical thinking and the major concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of statistics and probability, |
Student teacher struggles and/or has some misconceptions about statistical thinking and the major concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of statistics and probability, |
|
Geometry, Trigonometry, and Measurement (NCTM 1e) |
Student teacher demonstrates and applies understandings of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of geometry including using visual representations for numerical functions and relations, data and statistics, and networks, to provide a lens for solving problems in the physical world. |
Student teacher has knowledge of major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of geometry |
Student teachers struggles and/or has some misconceptions about major mathematics concepts, procedures, knowledge, and applications of geometry |
|
83
IU School of Education – IUI Student Teaching
FINAL ASSESSMENT – Part B
Science
Student Teacher Semester/Year School Grade Level
Subject Area Mentor Teacher Coach
This assessment should be completed by the mentor teacher during the last week of student teaching. The completed assessment should be shared with the student teacher during a conference. Both the mentor and student teacher should sign the completed form, which should be submitted to the university coach.
For each competency, please indicate the level of proficiency for your student teacher. 1—Needs Support
Student teacher is struggling and will require significant support if placed in charge of a classroom.
2—Developing
Student teacher will initially need some assistance when beginning a professional career.
3—Proficient
Student teacher is clearly ready to work as a teacher beginning a professional career.
U/D (Unable to Determine) Not enough evidence available. (Please be sure to comment.)
|
||||
Secondary Science Education |
||||
|
||||
Content Knowledge |
||||
1a Demonstrates and applies knowledge of major concepts, procedures, and applications in varied contexts, and connections within and among science domains. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments (Please specify content areas) |
84
Science Practices |
||||
2a Uses problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, makes sense of a wide variety of problems and perseveres in solving them, applies and adapts a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of science and other contexts, and formulates and tests conjectures in order to frame generalizations. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
2b Reasons abstractly, reflectively, and quantitatively, critiquing the reasoning of others; recognizes structure and expresses regularity in patterns of scientific reasoning; uses multiple representations to model and describe science; and utilizes appropriate scientific vocabulary and symbols to communicate scientific ideas to others. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
2c Formulates, represents, analyzes, and interprets scientific models derived from real-world contexts. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
2d Organizes thinking and uses the language of science to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
85
2e Demonstrates the interconnectedness of scientific ideas and how they build on one another and recognizes and applies connections among these ideas and across various content areas. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
2f Models how the development of scientific understanding within and among science domains intersects with the practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
|
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
Content Pedagogy |
|||||
3a Applies knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary science and their relationship to student learning within and across science domains. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
3b Analyzes and considers research in planning for and leading students in rich scientific learning experiences. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
3c Plans lessons and units that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction for divers86e68 populations, and science-specific and instructional technologies in building all students’ conceptual |
understanding and procedural proficiency. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
3d Provides students with opportunities to communicate about science and make connections with other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
|
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
3e Implements techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding scientific discussions, identifying key scientific ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
3f Plans, selects, implements, interprets, and uses formative and summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on scientific proficiencies essential for all students. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
87
3g Monitors students’ progress, makes instructional decisions, and measures students’ understanding of science and ability using formative and summative assessments. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
Science Learning Environment |
|||||
4a. Exhibits knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior and demonstrates a positive disposition toward scientific processes and learning. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
4b Plans and creates developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in science education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
88
4c Incorporates knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and includes culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
4d Demonstrates equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
|||||
4e. Applies science content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as physical models, drawings, virtual environments, presentation tools, and science-specific technologies; and makes sound decisions about when such tools enhance teaching and learning, recognizing both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools. |
|||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
|
Comments |
89
Impact on Student Learning |
||||
5a Verifies that secondary students demonstrate conceptual understanding; procedural fluency; the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems; logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning; productive disposition toward science; and the application of science in a variety of contexts within major scientific domains. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
5b Engages students in developmentally appropriate scientific activities and investigations that require active engagement and includes science-specific technology in building new knowledge. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
5c. Collects, organizes, analyzes, and reflects on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determines the extent to which students’ scientific proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
90
Professional Knowledge and Skills |
||||
6a. Takes an active role in their professional growth by participating in professional development experiences that directly relate to the learning and teaching of science. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
6b Engages in continuous and collaborative learning that draws upon research in science education to inform practice; enhance learning opportunities for all students’ scientific knowledge development; involves colleagues, other school professionals, families, and various stakeholders; and advances their development as a reflective practitioner.. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments |
||||
6c Utilizes resources from professional science education organizations. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
6d Uses knowledge of science to select and use appropriate technological tools. |
||||
Evidence in Planning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence in Teaching |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Evidence of Effectiveness in Producing the Desired Student Learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
U/D |
Comments
|
91
FINAL ASSESSMENT - English/Language Arts
FINAL ASSESSMENT - English/Language Arts
FINAL ASSESSMENT - English/Language Arts
FINAL ASSESSMENT- SOCIAL STUDIES
FINAL ASSESSMENT- SOCIAL STUDIES
FINAL ASSESSMENT- SOCIAL STUDIES
IU School of Education – Indianapolis Student Teaching
Student Teacher Semester/Year
School Grade Level
Mentor Teacher Subject Area Coach
This assessment should be completed by the mentor teacher during week 8 of student teaching. The completed assessment should be shared with the student teacher during a conference. Both the mentor and student teacher should sign the completed form, which should be submitted to the university coach.
For each competency, please indicate the level of proficiency for your student teacher. 1—Needs Support
Student teacher is struggling and will require significant support if placed in charge of a classroom.
2—Developing
Student teacher is progressing towards independence as a classroom teacher.
3—Proficient
Student teacher is clearly ready to work as a teacher beginning a professional career.
U/D (Unable to Determine)
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
Not enough evidence available. (Please be sure to comment.)
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE |
||||
Competency |
Level |
Comments |
||
Designs instruction that reflects a command of the subject matter. |
Select a Level |
|
||
Provides learners with accurate information/feedback. |
Select a Level |
|
||
Demonstrates a thorough knowledge of standards. |
|
Select a Level |
|
|
|
||||
PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE/INSTRUCTION |
||||
Competency |
Level |
Comments |
||
Engages all students in learning activities. |
Select a Level |
|
||
Designs lessons which promote student learning |
Select a Level |
|
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
92
Invites learners to employ multiple approaches, solutions, and diverse pathways to learning. |
Select a Level |
|
Sets clear goals for learning experiences. |
Select a Level |
|
Uses multiple strategies that engage students in active learning. |
Select a Level |
|
Motivates all students to learn. |
Select a Level |
|
Asks questions that promote learning. |
Select a Level |
|
Builds on students’ prior knowledge. |
Select a Level |
|
Supports learners with special needs. |
Select a Level |
|
ASSESSMENT |
||
Competency |
Level |
Comments |
Uses assessments that align with instruction. (Uses assessment thoughtfully and purposefully?) |
Select a Level |
|
Demonstrates teaching as an inquiry process, collecting and analyzing information about students’ learning and generating plans designed to support student learning. |
Select a Level |
|
ENVIRONMENT |
||
Competency |
Level |
Comments |
Establishes rapport with students. |
Select a Level |
|
Shows patience when working with students. |
Select a Level |
|
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
93
Shows respect for all students. |
Select a Level |
|
Creates a collaborative, supportive environment that supports learning. |
Select a Level |
|
Maintains positive home-school connections. (Interacts positively with parents, initiates contact, etc.) |
Select a Level |
|
TECHNOLOGY |
||
Competency |
Level |
Comments |
Utilizes a variety of media and technology to support instruction. |
Select a Level |
|
Demonstrates the ability to locate assessments from a variety of resources including the Internet, CD ROMS, etc |
Select a Level |
|
Design developmentally appropriate learning opportunities that apply technology-enhanced instructional strategies to support the diverse needs of learners (ISTE 2) |
Select a Level |
|
PROFESSIONALISM |
||
Competency |
Level |
Comments |
Accurately judges personal strengths or weaknesses when self-assessing. |
Select a Level |
|
Expresses ideas clearly when speaking. |
Select a Level |
|
Establishes rapport with mentor teacher. |
Select a Level |
|
Focuses on the positive under challenging circumstances. |
Select a Level |
|
Works well with different personalities. |
Select a Level |
|
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
94
Works well with people from all cultural backgrounds. |
|
|
||||
|
Select a Level |
|||||
|
||||||
Appreciates multiple perspectives. |
Select a Level |
|
||||
Is open to receiving help and/or constructive feedback. |
|
|
||||
|
Select a Level |
|||||
|
||||||
Comes to student teaching prepared. |
|
|
||||
|
Select a Level |
|||||
|
||||||
Is consistently on time. |
|
|
||||
|
Select a Level |
|||||
|
||||||
Collaborates with other teachers. (Integrates classroom studies, discussion regarding students’ needs, etc.) |
|
|
||||
|
Select a Level |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
The student teacher posses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of culture and cultural diversity. (NCSS 1.1) |
||||||
NCSS 1.1 |
Level |
Select a Level |
Comments |
|
|
|
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of time, continuity and change. (NCSS 1.2) |
||||||
NCSS 1.2 |
Level |
Select a Level |
Comments |
|
|
|
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of people, places, and environments (NCSS 1.3) |
||||||
NCSS 1.3 |
Level |
Select a Level |
Comments |
|
|
|
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of individual development and identity. (NCSS 1.4) |
||||||
NCSS 1.4 |
Level |
Select a Level |
Comments |
|
|
|
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
95
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of individuals, groups, and institutions. (NCSS 1.5) |
NCSS 1.5 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of power, authority and governance. (NCSS 1.6) |
NCSS 1.6 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and disposition to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of production, distribution and consumption of good and services. (NCSS 1.7) |
NCSS 1.7 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level of the study of science, technology and society. (NCSS 1.8) |
NCSS 1.8 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of global connections and interdependence. (NCSS 1.9) |
NCSS 1.9 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level of the study of civic ideals and practices. (NCSS 1.10) |
NCSS 1.10 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of history (NCSS 2.1) |
NCSS 2.1 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of geography. (NCSS 2.2) |
NCSS 2.2 Level Select a Level Comments |
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
96
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of civics and government. (NCSS 2.3) |
NCSS 2.3 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of economics. (NCSS 2.4) |
NCSS 2.4 Level Select a Level Comments |
The student teacher possesses the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of psychology. (NCSS 2.5) |
NCSS 2.5 Level Select a Level Comments |
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
1 2 3 U/D
97
Student Teaching Week by Week Guide- 16 weeks
Weeks |
Seminar- Wednesday at 5:30 pm |
Assignments Need to be uploaded onto CANVAS |
Gradual Release of Control |
1 |
3 days of Professional Developmen t |
Read Handbook- Sign off on CANVAS Create 1-2 minute Intro Video on GoReact, upload on CANVAS Read Introduction to “The Power of Our Words” Post a discussion on CANVAS. |
Begin Student Teaching Experience Log Get to know the technology you will be using Make sure you have access to the learning materials needed to teach (textbook, online tools, etc.) Talk about planning methods Participate in all school meetings (PD, grade level, etc.) Set-up your workspace to get organized |
2 |
5 days of Professional Developmen t |
Create a welcome letter to your families (upload on CANVAS). Talk to your MT about sharing it with families. Review/Submit your Teaching Philosophy on CANVAS Read Chapter 1 “The Power of Our Words” Post a discussion on CANVAS. |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Get to know the technology you will be using Make sure you have access to the learning materials needed to teach (textbook, online tools, etc.) Talk about planning methods Participate in all school meetings (PD, grade level, etc.) Set-up your workspace to get organized |
3 Create Professional Growth and Goals |
SEMINAR- Talk about Observation Form- (H/H) |
Journal Reflection on CANVAS- What are your first impressions of student teaching? What new learning have you had? What are you most looking forward to? Go Over Weekly Checklist (Make sure MT has a copy) Create Goals/Action Steps based on the Observation Form (Upload on CANVAS under Professional Growth and Goals document) Upload Class Schedule onto CANVAS |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Get to know students Start to learn the routines and procedures of the classroom Jump-in and help in any way possible |
4 Video on GoReact |
SEMINAR- UDL Lesson planning (H/H) |
Videotape a lesson or small group on GoReact and reflect with ten thoughtful |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Co-Plan and teach a small group |
98
|
|
comments (upload to CANVAS) Read Chapter 3 “The Power of Our Words” Post a discussion on CANVAS. |
Plan and implement a Morning Meeting Start to decide on one or two subject areas you will be responsible for teaching Co-plan a couple of subject areas with your grade-level team or MT |
5 Observe#1 |
SEMINAR- Creating a strong Classroom Environment / Classroom Management (Whole group) |
Observation #1 -Turn in UDL lesson plan 48 hours prior on CANVAS Read Chapter 4 “These Kids are Out of Control” Post a discussion on CANVAS Divide up Chapters from “The Power of our Words” (Chapters 5,6,7) to Jigsaw at Seminar on week 6 |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Begin teaching one or two subject areas daily Teach your 1st formal observation with your coach |
6 Mentor teacher Observe |
SEMINAR- Benchmark Project Jigsaw “The Power of Words around Behavior” (H/H) |
Discuss with Mentor Teacher about Benchmark project Be prepared to share out about “The Power of Our Words” (Chapter 5,6,7) |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Continue teaching above subjects Fully co-plan all subject areas with your MT or grade-level team MT will observe and give feedback on the formal observation form (submit to coach) |
7 Observe #2 |
SEMINAR- Differentiatio n/ Assessment (Whole group) |
Observation # 2 -Turn in UDL lesson plan 48 hours prior on CANVAS |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully teach 2 subjects Keep working with small groups to provide interventions Teach your 2nd formal observation with your coach |
8 |
SEMINAR- ENL / Homelessne ss (Whole group) |
Prepare for the Mid-Term Evaluation by reflecting and completing the Final Evaluation document and prepare to discuss this with MT and Coach next week |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas with assistance as needed. Begin to reflect on your mid- term evaluation and think about next steps and goals you will set for yourself |
9 Mid-Term Eval |
|
Upload Mid-Term Evaluation onto CANVAS Update your Mid-Term Growth Plan and Goals |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas |
99
|
|
Document and upload onto CANVAS |
Be sure you are beginning to look and discuss Benchmark IV-Part B with your MT |
10 |
SEMINAR- Science of Reading review (Whole group) |
|
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas Be sure you are beginning to look and discuss Benchmark IV-Part B with your MT |
11 Observe # 3 |
|
Observation #3 -Turn in UDL lesson plan 48 hours prior on CANVAS |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas Teach your 3rd formal observation with your coach |
12 Video on GoReact |
SEMINAR- Resume/ Interview practice/ Licensure/ Graduation (H/H) |
Videotape a lesson on GoReact and reflect with ten thoughtful comments (upload to CANVAS) Look over your Resume Review/Revise your Teaching Philosophy on CANVAS |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas Set up a time to talk to your coach if you need support with resume, interview preparation, etc. |
|
Fall Break |
Enjoy the time off- Relax and Rejuvenate! |
|
13 Observe #4 |
SEMINAR- Trauma Informed Care (Whole Group) |
Observation #4-Turn in UDL lesson plan 48 hours prior on CANVAS |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas Teach your 4th formal observation with your coach |
14 Mentor Teacher Observe |
|
|
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas MT will observe and give feedback on the formal observation form (submit to coach) Be sure you are finalizing and completing your Benchmark IV- Part B project |
15 Video on GoReact |
SEMINAR- Check-in (Break out groups or 1:1) |
Videotape a lesson on GoReact and reflect with ten thoughtful comments (upload to CANVAS) |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Plan with MT and assist with teaching |
100
|
|
|
Be sure you are finalizing and completing your Benchmark IV- Part B project |
16 |
SEMINAR- Present Benchmark project (H/H) |
Have Benchmark project ready to present and turn it into CANVAS Review/Revise your Teaching Philosophy on CANVAS Complete any School of Education Surveys |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Plan with MT and assist with teaching Work on completing final evaluation with your MT Check with MT and other teachers in the building about observing other grades and content areas in the building |
17 Final Eval |
|
Upload your final evaluation onto CANVAS Upload your timesheets on CANVAS and send to Gena Vogelgesang: gvogelge@iu.edu Do a final reflection on your Professional Growth and Goals Document Complete any School of Education Surveys |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Enjoy reflecting on the growth you and your students have made Write a thank you to your MT and building administration |
Other Trainings that need to be completed as part of Student Teaching:
Gang-Violence –Complete PowerPoint/Quiz
Seizure/Epilepsy –Complete PowerPoint/Quiz
101
Student Teaching Week by Week Guide- 8 weeks
Weeks |
Seminar Wednesday at 5:30 pm |
Assignments Need to be uploaded onto CANVAS |
Gradual Release of Control |
1 |
3 days of Professional Development |
Read Handbook- Sign off on CANVAS Create 1-2 minute Intro Video on GoReact, upload on CANVAS Read Introduction to “The Power of Our Words” Post a discussion on CANVAS. |
Begin Student Teaching Experience Log Get to know the technology you will be using Make sure you have access to the learning materials needed to teach (textbook, online tools, etc.) Talk about planning methods Participate in all school meetings (PD, grade level, etc.) Set-up your workspace to get organized |
2 |
5 days of Professional Development |
Create a welcome letter to your families (upload on CANVAS) Review/Submit your Teaching Philosophy on CANVAS Read Chapter 1 “The Power of Our Words” Post a discussion on CANVAS. |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Get to know the technology you will be using Make sure you have access to the learning materials needed to teach (textbook, online tools, etc.) Talk about planning methods Participate in all school meetings (PD, grade level, etc.) Set-up your workspace to get organized |
3 Create ProfesionalGrowth and Goals |
SEMINAR- Talk about Observation Form- (H/H) |
Journal Reflection on CANVAS- What are your first impressions of student teaching? What new learning have you had? What are you most looking forward to? Go Over Weekly Checklist (Make sure MT has a copy) |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Get to know students Start to learn the routines and procedures of the classroom Plan and implement a Morning Meeting Co-Plan and teach a small group |
102
|
|
Create Goals/Action Steps based on the Observation Form (Upload on CANVAS under Professional Growth and Goals document) Upload Class Schedule onto CANVAS |
Jump-in and help in any way possible |
4 Video on GoReact |
SEMINAR- UDL Lesson planning (H/H) |
Videotape a lesson or small group on GoReact and reflect with ten thoughtful comments (upload to CANVAS) Read Chapter 3 “The Power of Our Words” Post a discussion on CANVAS. |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Start to decide on one or two subject areas you will be responsible for teaching- Begin teaching one or two subjects daily Co-plan a couple of subject areas with your grade-level team MT |
5 Observe#1 |
SEMINAR- Creating a strong Classroom Environment/ Classroom Management (Whole group) |
Observation #1 -Turn in UDL lesson plan 48 hours prior on CANVAS Read Chapter 4 “These Kids are Out of Control” Post a discussion on CANVAS Divide up Chapters from “The Power of our Words” (Chapters 5,6,7) to Jigsaw at Seminar on week 6 |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully co-plan all subject areas with your MT or grade-level team Continue teaching one or two subject areas daily Teach your 1st formal observation with your coach |
6 Mentor teacher Observe Mid-Term Eval |
SEMINAR- Benchmark Project (H/H) |
Discuss with Mentor Teacher about Benchmark project Be prepared to share out about “The Power of Our Words” (Chapter 5,6,7) Prepare for the Mid-Term Evaluation by reflecting and completing the Final Evaluation document and prepare to discuss this with MT and Coach |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Begin teaching all content areas MT will observe and give feedback on the formal observation form (submit to coach) |
7 Observe #2 |
SEMINAR- Differentiation/ Assessment (Whole group) |
Observation # 2 -Turn in UDL lesson plan 48 hours prior on CANVAS |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas with assistance as needed. Keep working with small groups to provide interventions |
103
|
|
|
Teach your 2nd formal observation with your coach |
8 |
SEMINAR-ENL / Homelessness (Whole group) |
Finalize and Complete your Benchmark Project |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Fully plan and teach all subject areas with assistance as needed. Begin to reflect on your final evaluation with your MT |
9 Final Eval Video on GoReact #2 |
|
Videotape a lesson or small group on GoReact and reflect with ten thoughtful comments (upload to CANVAS) Upload Final Evaluation onto CANVAS Update your Mid-Term Growth Plan and Goals Document and upload onto CANVAS Upload your timesheets on CANVAS and send to Gena Vogelgesang: |
Enter time into Student Teaching Experience Log Begin to turn teaching back over to your MT Enjoy reflecting on the growth you and your students have made Write a thank you to your MT and building administration |
Other Trainings that need to be completed as part of Student Teaching:
Gang-Violence –Complete PowerPoint/Quiz
Seizure/Epilepsy –Complete PowerPoint/Quiz
104
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Lesson Plan
Student Name: |
Lesson Date and Time: |
|
Grade: |
Subject: |
|
Rationale: (How does this lesson connect to students current thinking? Why is it important to do this lesson at this time?) |
||
Standards for Lesson: |
||
Objectives/Goals for Lesson: (What do you want students to know, understand and do?) (Use this stem... Student’s should be able to...) |
||
Introduction & Hook: (How will you engage students to begin lesson? How will you find out what students already know about the topic? Activating prior knowledge? What teaching methods are you using? How are you actively engaging students?) |
||
|
How will you support ALL learners? Give specific strategies you will implement throughout the lesson regarding: |
|
|
Engagement (The WHY of learning) |
|
|
Representation (The WHAT of learning) |
|
|
Multiple Means of Action and Expression (The HOW of learning) |
|
105
|
|
|
Sequence of Activities throughout the lesson: (Be sure to include a TIMEFRAME for the mini-lesson, groups, centers, stations, etc.) Reflect on the Gradual Release: I Do, We Do, You Do (create a script for who will do what) Assessments: (What formative or summative data will you collect? How will you know students understood the lesson?) |
||
|
Wrap-Up: (How will you close out the lesson?) |
|
Cultural Relevant Materials to Use: (Include titles of critical literacy trade books with Links, websites with links, and other materials needed to be successful teaching this lesson.) |
106
|
|||
If you are teaching a Literacy Lesson- Which components, will you address? Please check the box for the literacy components that will be observed. |
|||
|
|
Oral Language (listening comprehension, collaborative conversations, opportunities to build understanding through peer discussion) |
|
|
|
Phonemic Awareness (recognizing rhyming words, clapping syllables, blending, segmenting, and manipulating phonemes) |
|
|
|
Phonics (sound-spelling patterns, word analysis, syllable patterns) |
|
|
|
Fluency (reading accuracy and automaticity, prosody, fluency at letter, word, phrase and text level) |
|
|
|
Vocabulary (modeling and use of academic words, morphology, connection between new words and known words) |
|
|
|
Comprehension (relates ideas to experience, inferencing, text structure and features) |
|
|
|
Writing (grammar and language conventions, addresses a variety of purposes and audiences, writing process) |
107